Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:55
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Yankees get completely manhandled by Dodgers in ghastly blowout loss - New York Post
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
O'Malley's dad 'super relaxed' cornering title bout - ESPN
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Scientists Uncover “Alien” Chemistry Under Earth’s Largest Lithium Deposits - SciTechDaily
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Nemo harum distinctio cupiditate soluta nesciunt beatae harum.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
You Can Now Launch First-Party PlayStation Games Through the Xbox PC App - Push Square
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s a sleep paralysis demon? And other facts of the bizarre phenomenon - CNN
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
They Finally Opened the Moon – What Scientists Found Inside Changes Everything - The Daily Galaxy